The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strongly criticized the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) assembly’s resolution passed on November 6, 2024, advocating for the restoration of the region’s special status. The BJP has labeled the resolution as “illegal” and “unconstitutional,” fueling a renewed political debate.
BJP’s Legal and Procedural Criticisms
- Illegality Concerns: Sunil Sharma, the BJP leader and opposition head in the J&K assembly, condemned the resolution for lacking “legal sanctity.” He argued that the J&K assembly has no authority to challenge decisions made by Parliament or the Supreme Court. Sharma reiterated that Article 370, which granted special status to J&K, is now “history” and cannot be revived.
- Procedural Violations: Sharma also questioned the process by which the resolution was introduced. He pointed out that it was not listed in the day’s agenda, suggesting that the move was deliberate to bypass proper legislative procedures. He further accused the assembly speaker of collaborating with the government to advance the resolution, which undermines the integrity of the legislative process.
Political Context and Public Reaction
The resolution, proposed by the National Conference (NC), calls on the Government of India to engage in dialogue with J&K’s elected representatives about restoring the region’s special status. The NC believes this is necessary to safeguard the rights and identity of the people of J&K, a concern that has grown since the revocation of Article 370 in August 2019.
After the resolution passed, BJP members protested inside the assembly. They tore copies of the document and demanded clarity from other political parties, including Congress, about their stance on Article 370. This incident underscores the ongoing political divisions within J&K, particularly over the region’s future governance.
Broader Implications for Regional Autonomy
The BJP’s response highlights its commitment to the central government’s position on J&K’s integration into India. The assembly’s resolution could reignite discussions on regional autonomy, minority rights, and governance in the region. Political tensions between various factions are likely to continue as they navigate J&K’s complex future.
This controversy shows that debates about J&K’s status remain far from resolved. With different political forces holding competing views, the issue of special status and regional autonomy in J&K will continue to shape the region’s future. The BJP’s opposition further solidifies its stance, making clear that discussions surrounding Article 370 and J&K’s governance will remain a central topic in Indian politics.
